Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25675.1358263523@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Vik Reykja escribi�: >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Idempotent is a ten-dollar word. Can we find something that average >>> people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to understand? >> I disagree that we should dumb things down when the word means exactly what >> we want and based on the rest of this thread is the only word or word >> cluster that carries the desired meaning. I'm not quite convinced that it means *exactly* what we want. The dictionary definition, according to my laptop's dictionary, is "denoting an element of a set that is unchanged in value when multiplied or otherwise operated on by itself". I'm well aware that computer people often use it to mean "an operation that doesn't change the system state if the state is already what's wanted", but I think that's probably an abuse of the mathematical usage. And in any case, I'm not sure that non-hackers would immediately recognize the term, nor be enlightened by their dictionaries. But ... > Yeah, after seeing the alternatives, I agree that it seems okay, ... I was only asking if we *could* find a better choice. Seems we can't, so let's stick with this. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: