Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Дата
Msg-id 25104.1272406109@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 17:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we should just lose that test, as well as the variable.

> Yes, though it looks like it is still necessary in creating a valid
> initial state because otherwise we may have xids in KnownAssigned array
> that are already complete.

Huh?  How is a filter as coarse as an oldest-running-XID filter going
to prevent that?  And aren't we initializing from trustworthy data in
ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo, anyway?

I still say it's useless.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recovery_connections cannot start
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Schema.Table.Col resolution seems broken in Alpha5