Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 32176e37d35c69ee4a2295a2a4b08812.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, April 25, 2010 20:55, Tom Lane wrote: > > That seems weird. Why do most of the runs show primary and standby > as having comparable speed, but a few show the standby as much slower? > The parameters for those runs don't seem obviously different from cases > where it's fast. I think there might have been something else going on > on the standby during those runs. Or do you think those represent > cases where the mystery slowdown event happened? > the strange case is the scale 100 standby's slow start, followed by a steady increase during -c 1, then -c 10, and finally getting up to speed with -c 20 (and up). And these slow-but-growing standby series are interspersed with normal (high-speed) primary series. I'll try to repeat this pattern on other hardware; although if my tests were run with faulty hardware I wouldn't know how/why that would give the above effect (such a 'regular aberration'). testing is more difficult than I thought... Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: