Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 447e467376088e0e1cf10aee567dd541.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 4, 2010 18:19, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 18:10 +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> It would be interesting if anyone repeated these simple tests and >> produced evidence that these non-HS. >> >> (Unfortunately, I have at the moment not much time for more testing) > > Would you be able to make those systems available for further testing? No. sorry. > First, I'd perform the same test with the systems swapped, so we know > more about the symmetry of the issue. After that, would like to look > more into internals. you mean "systems swapped", primary and standby? primary and standby were on the same machine in these tests (even the same raid). I can eventually move the standby (the 'slow' side, as it stands) to another, quite similar machine. Not in the coming days though... > Is it possible to setup SytemTap and dtrace on these systems? I did install systemtap last week. dtrace is not installed (I think. I've never used either.) Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: