Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От YUriy Zhuravlev
Тема Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Дата
Msg-id 2503610.GK2PORpHW9@dinodell
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello.
Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a full plan. In 
this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the under task parallel query 
does not have such a problem?

> This turns out not to be straightforward to code, because we
> don't have a generic plan tree walker, 

I have an inner development. I am using python analyzing header files and 
generates a universal walker (parser, paths ,executer and etc trees), as well 
as the serializer and deserializer to jsonb. Maybe I should publish this code?

Thanks.

-- 
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query