Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151022162646.GA22539@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:15:35PM +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote: > Hello. > Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a > full plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the > under task parallel query does not have such a problem? > > > This turns out not to be straightforward to code, because we don't > > have a generic plan tree walker, > > I have an inner development. I am using python analyzing header > files and generates a universal walker (parser, paths ,executer and > etc trees), as well as the serializer and deserializer to jsonb. > Maybe I should publish this code? Please do. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: