Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 250360.1689781152@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > I tried this out. It looks good to me, and I like it. Not translating > the labels seems correct to me. > +1 for backpatching to 16, given that it's a psql-only change that > pertains to a backend change that was done in the 16 timeframe. Agreed. In the interests of moving things along, I'll take point on getting this committed. > Regarding the controversy of showing SET for previous versions, I think > it's clearer if it's shown, because ultimately what the user really > wants to know is if the role can be SET to; they don't want to have to > learn from memory in which version they can SET because the column is > empty and in which version they have to look for the label. Seems reasonable. I'll go with that interpretation unless there's pretty quick pushback. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: