Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230719101328.dcfbbvxjenac7ers@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command (Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I tried this out. It looks good to me, and I like it. Not translating the labels seems correct to me. +1 for backpatching to 16, given that it's a psql-only change that pertains to a backend change that was done in the 16 timeframe. Regarding the controversy of showing SET for previous versions, I think it's clearer if it's shown, because ultimately what the user really wants to know is if the role can be SET to; they don't want to have to learn from memory in which version they can SET because the column is empty and in which version they have to look for the label. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Small aircraft do not crash frequently ... usually only once!" (ponder, http://thedailywtf.com/)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: