Re: psql \l error
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \l error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2503.957242091@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql \l error (SAKAIDA <sakaida@psn.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
RE: psql \l error
Re: psql \l error Re: psql \l error Re: psql \l error |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
SAKAIDA <sakaida@psn.co.jp> writes: > A_server : configure (in USA) > B_server : configure --enable--multibyte (in Japan) > By using the B_server's psql, prompt> psql -h A_server > ERROR: Multibyte support must be enable to use this function This is evidently happening because psql's initial inquiry about the database encoding fails. Seems like it might be a good idea if the non-MULTIBYTE stub versions of pg_encoding_to_char() and friends were to return default values (eg, "SQL_ASCII") instead of erroring out. A MULTIBYTE version of psql really ought to be able to work with a non-MULTIBYTE server. > postgres=# \l > ERROR: No such function 'pg_encoding_to_char' with the > specified attributes Hmm. This is happening because 7.0 psql tries to display the encoding of each database if psql was compiled with MULTIBYTE. Here you are evidently talking to a pre-7.0 server (both because a 7.0 server should have that function, even if the function refuses to work ;-)) and because a 7.0 server does not spell the 'No such function' error message quite that way. This one is a little nastier. The only solution I could see that would guarantee backwards compatibility is for psql not to try to display the database encoding; that doesn't seem like a win. I think there are some other small incompatibilities between 7.0 psql and pre-7.0 servers anyway, so eliminating this one by dumbing down \l is probably not the way to proceed. So, I'd suggest fixing the first issue (so that 7.0 MULTIBYTE psql works with non-MULTIBYTE 7.0 server) but not trying to do anything about MULTIBYTE psql with a pre-7.0 server. Comments? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: