Re: psql \l error
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \l error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000502165335D.t-ishii@sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql \l error (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> This is evidently happening because psql's initial inquiry about the > database encoding fails. > > Seems like it might be a good idea if the non-MULTIBYTE stub versions of > pg_encoding_to_char() and friends were to return default values (eg, > "SQL_ASCII") instead of erroring out. A MULTIBYTE version of psql > really ought to be able to work with a non-MULTIBYTE server. > > > postgres=# \l > > ERROR: No such function 'pg_encoding_to_char' with the > > specified attributes > > Hmm. This is happening because 7.0 psql tries to display the encoding > of each database if psql was compiled with MULTIBYTE. > > Here you are evidently talking to a pre-7.0 server (both because > a 7.0 server should have that function, even if the function > refuses to work ;-)) and because a 7.0 server does not spell the > 'No such function' error message quite that way. > > This one is a little nastier. The only solution I could see that would > guarantee backwards compatibility is for psql not to try to display the > database encoding; that doesn't seem like a win. I think there are > some other small incompatibilities between 7.0 psql and pre-7.0 servers > anyway, so eliminating this one by dumbing down \l is probably not > the way to proceed. > > So, I'd suggest fixing the first issue (so that 7.0 MULTIBYTE psql works > with non-MULTIBYTE 7.0 server) but not trying to do anything about > MULTIBYTE psql with a pre-7.0 server. Comments? Sounds reasonable. I will fix the former but will leave the later as it is. -- Tatsuo Ishii
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: