Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24529.1415921093@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to
9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-11-13 18:00:45 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: >> Err. That might have come off poorly- I didn't mean that sarcastically >> but was really wondering how far back you test (or how far back we >> feel pg_dumpall needs to work against..). > pg_dump currently errors out before 7.0: > I do think it might be justifyable to bump that a bit. Yeah, we've discussed that before, and I wouldn't mind explicitly ripping out support for pre-7.3 or pre-7.4 servers; we could get rid of a pretty fair amount of cruft in pg_dump with such a policy change. But right now the standard is 7.0 and I don't want that goalpost moving silently. (And yeah, I did just test it back to 7.0. But that depends on my HPPA box which is looking increasingly frail. I'm not sure that we can get versions that old to compile on more modern platforms, at least not without a lot more work than it's probably worth.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: