Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141113231520.GN13473@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-11-13 18:00:45 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote: > > I'm happy to fix it either way (and fix it for 8.1, and back to.. what? > > Postgres95?) > > Err. That might have come off poorly- I didn't mean that sarcastically > but was really wondering how far back you test (or how far back we > feel pg_dumpall needs to work against..). I was originally going to say > 7.4, but then figured we might try to go back farther than even that > and, well, Postgres95 is the oldest we have "easy" access to.. pg_dump currently errors out before 7.0:/* * We allow the server to be back to 7.0, and up to any minor release of * ourown major version. (See also version check in pg_dumpall.c.) */fout->minRemoteVersion = 70000;fout->maxRemoteVersion= (PG_VERSION_NUM / 100) * 100 + 99; I do think it might be justifyable to bump that a bit. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: