Re: PGconn thread safety
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGconn thread safety |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24298.1044602058@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGconn thread safety (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGconn thread safety
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 21:19, ahoward wrote: >> does anyone know if PGconns are safe to use from multiple threads of control? > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/libpq-threading.html > "libpq is thread-safe as of PostgreSQL 7.0, so long as no two threads > attempt to manipulate the same PGconn object at the same time." That's the theory anyway. I believe it actually is free of unsafe uses of static variables. However, someone recently pointed out that it uses some libc routines that probably aren't thread-safe; so there's some cleanup yet to do before we can claim real thread safety. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: