Re: PGconn thread safety
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGconn thread safety |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200302071320.20996.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGconn thread safety (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGconn thread safety
Re: PGconn thread safety |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Friday 07 February 2003 12:44 pm, you wrote: > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > That's the theory anyway. I believe it actually is free of unsafe uses > of static variables. However, someone recently pointed out that it uses > some libc routines that probably aren't thread-safe; so there's some > cleanup yet to do before we can claim real thread safety. Well, I ran a mutlithreaded test where around 30 connections were hammered in a mutlihtreaded servers using libpq for 100,000 transactions. I didn't notice any data inconsistency. Only noticable thing was that postgresql was not returning even simplest result in less than 200 ms. So in order to achieve a good throughput, I had to up the number of connections. The max throughput. was 200ms/no. of connections. but that is a different issue.. Shridhar
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: