Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23526.989276061@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> It seems to me that only superusers should be allowed to read the >> pg_statistic table. Or am I overreacting? Comments? > You are not overreacting. Imagine a salary column. I can imagine > max/min being quite interesting. A fine example, indeed ;-) > I doubt it is worth letting non-super users see values in that table. > Their only value is in debugging the optimizer, which seems like a > super-user job anyway. Well, mumble. I routinely ask people who're complaining of bad plans for extracts from their pg_statistic table. I don't foresee that need vanishing any time soon :-(. The idea of a view seemed nice, in part because it could be set up to give all the useful info with a simple select * from pg_statview where relname = 'foo'; rather than the messy three-way join you have to type now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: