Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105071737.f47Hbjj16291@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Isn't pg_statistic a security hole? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Right now anyone can look in pg_statistic and discover the min/max/most > common values of other people's tables. That's not a lot of info, but > it might still be more than you want them to find out. And the > statistical changes that I'm about to commit will allow a couple dozen > values to be exposed, not only three values per column. > > It seems to me that only superusers should be allowed to read the > pg_statistic table. Or am I overreacting? Comments? You are not overreacting. Imagine a salary column. I can imagine max/min being quite interesting. I doubt it is worth letting non-super users see values in that table. Their only value is in debugging the optimizer, which seems like a super-user job anyway. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: