Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23452.984359426@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Also, what signal should people send to a backend to kill just that > backend? I don't know that we do or should recommend such a thing at all ... but SIGTERM should work if anything does (and it is, not coincidentally, the default kind of signal for kill(1)). > In my reading of the code, I see: > pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); /* cancel current query and exit */ > pqsignal(SIGQUIT, die); /* could reassign this sig for another use */ This is already obsolete ;=) ... I'm just waiting on Vadim's approval of my xlog mods before committing a change in SIGQUIT handling --- see discussion a couple days ago. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: