Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23452.984359426@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Also, what signal should people send to a backend to kill just that
> backend?
I don't know that we do or should recommend such a thing at all ...
but SIGTERM should work if anything does (and it is, not coincidentally,
the default kind of signal for kill(1)).
> In my reading of the code, I see:
> pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); /* cancel current query and exit */
> pqsignal(SIGQUIT, die); /* could reassign this sig for another use */
This is already obsolete ;=) ... I'm just waiting on Vadim's approval of
my xlog mods before committing a change in SIGQUIT handling --- see
discussion a couple days ago.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: