Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200103120057.TAA21891@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I have applied the following patch to make SIGTERM backend exit clearer > > in the the server logs. "The system" is not really shutting down, but > > "the backend" is shutting down. > > This is a non-improvement. Please reverse it. SIGTERM would only be > sent to a backend if the database system were in fact shutting down. Also, what signal should people send to a backend to kill just that backend? In my reading of the code, I see: pqsignal(SIGTERM, die); /* cancel current query and exit */ pqsignal(SIGQUIT, die); /* could reassign this sigfor another use */ Are either of them safe? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: