Re: use of int4/int32 in C code
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: use of int4/int32 in C code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22993.1340142147@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: use of int4/int32 in C code (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: use of int4/int32 in C code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I thought the general idea was to use int32 most places, but int4 in >> catalog declarations. I don't think it's tremendously important if >> somebody uses the other though. > I concur with Peter that TMTOWTDI is not the right way to do this. I > think we ought to get rid of int4 in code and use int32 everywhere. I have not looked to see how many places do that. If it's a reasonably small number of places, I'm OK with getting rid of int4 at the C level. (int2/int8 the same of course.) If we are going to do that, though, we need to actually remove those typedefs. Leaving them around on the grounds that third-party code might be using them will just allow cases to creep back in. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: