Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22087.1255583096@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:51:13PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> That's not the worst of it :-( See >> <http://openacs.org/xowiki/How_to_install_in_Postgres_8.x> > This just illustrates the fact that at least as far as PostgreSQL is > concerned, OpenACS is a dead project. It's been at least 3 major > versions since they even attempted to keep compatible with PostgreSQL. That seems pretty harsh, considering that there's plenty of discussion of how to use OpenACS with PG on their website. What it looks like to me is that the recommendation about regex_flavor might be just cargo-cult programming. Somebody had some trouble with an updated PG version, turned on every backwards-compatibility option he could find, and when it worked he didn't inquire too closely into which settings were actually important. And ever since then that's been the received wisdom about how to make OpenACS run with Postgres. It would be interesting to try turning off these options one at a time to see which ones do matter. (I'd bet lunch that the one about add_missing_from is bogus, too, or could easily be made so. mysql isn't forgiving about missing FROM items, so it's hard to believe that they have a lot of such things no matter how little they care about Postgres.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: