Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21646.928250741@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> It'd probably be worthwhile to move NAMEDATALEN to config.h and make the >> other two symbols be computed off NAMEDATALEN. Any objections if I >> sneak that change into 6.5, or is it too close to being a "new feature"? > Don't they have to be visible to outside apps, so it is in postgres_ext.h? Good point --- I was thinking that postgres_ext.h includes config.h, but I see it ain't so. You're right, those definitions must stay where they are. Still, I wonder why OIDNAMELEN isn't just defined as (NAMEDATALEN+sizeof(Oid)) rather than putting a comment to that effect. I will check the uses and see if that is a safe change or not. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: