Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length

> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> It'd probably be worthwhile to move NAMEDATALEN to config.h and make the
> >> other two symbols be computed off NAMEDATALEN.  Any objections if I
> >> sneak that change into 6.5, or is it too close to being a "new feature"?
> 
> > Don't they have to be visible to outside apps, so it is in postgres_ext.h?
> 
> Good point --- I was thinking that postgres_ext.h includes config.h,
> but I see it ain't so.  You're right, those definitions must stay where
> they are.
> 
> Still, I wonder why OIDNAMELEN isn't just defined as
> (NAMEDATALEN+sizeof(Oid)) rather than putting a comment to that effect.
> I will check the uses and see if that is a safe change or not.

Yes, probably should be changed.  The old code did some fancy sed with
it, so maybe it had to be a real number back then, or perhaps initdb
pulls it from the file.  Not sure.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026