Re: numeric test on RiscPC
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: numeric test on RiscPC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20479.1018275503@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | numeric test on RiscPC (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: numeric test on RiscPC
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> writes: > I have just found to my surprise: > ============== running regression test queries ============== > parallel group (13 tests): char name int2 text float4 oid int4 varchar int8 float8 boolean bit numeric > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 27747 prlw1 72 4 596K 276K RUN 277.7H 98.10% 98.10% sh > 277.7H being just over 11.5 days! > Have any of you tried > PostgreSQL 7.2 on acorn32-unknown-netbsd1.5ZB, compiled by GCC egcs-1.1.2 > on an Acorn RiscPC with a SA-110? (This is the well known "halting problem" :) ) Looks like Acorn's shell has the same bug documented to exist in HPUX's shell (see doc/FAQ_HPUX :-() ... it gets confused when it has to manage more than about a dozen child processes. On HPUX I can work around this by telling pg_regress to use ksh instead. If you have any other shells besides plain sh, give them a try. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: