Re: numeric test on RiscPC
От | Patrick Welche |
---|---|
Тема | Re: numeric test on RiscPC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020409162250.O27638@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: numeric test on RiscPC (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: numeric test on RiscPC
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:18:23AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> writes: ... > > Have any of you tried > > PostgreSQL 7.2 on acorn32-unknown-netbsd1.5ZB, compiled by GCC egcs-1.1.2 > > on an Acorn RiscPC with a SA-110? (This is the well known "halting problem" :) ) > > Looks like Acorn's shell has the same bug documented to exist in HPUX's > shell (see doc/FAQ_HPUX :-() ... it gets confused when it has to manage > more than about a dozen child processes. > > On HPUX I can work around this by telling pg_regress to use ksh instead. > If you have any other shells besides plain sh, give them a try. Thanks for the tip! Even have the timezone errors mentioned in there. Now it gets as far as create_function_2. Hunting will be interesting: the only architecture dependent thing I can see in sh is: .if (${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc") || \ (${MACHINE_CPU} == "arm") TARGET_CHARFLAG= -DTARGET_CHAR="u_int8_t" .else TARGET_CHARFLAG= -DTARGET_CHAR="int8_t" .endif in the makefile.. (acorn32==arm) What is the HPUX fix? Cheers, Patrick
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: