Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
От | akp geek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incremental Backups in postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2024a9fb0911110951v4398f82cq60602ef46ed04067@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incremental Backups in postgres (Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi All - I have read the document got a reasonable understanding of the WAL process. I have some confusion regarding the process. 1. I have set up the archiving process. Now the archive file are going to a different mount point. 2. I set up job to create a back up of the PGDATA directory Are the 2 above steps enough for recovery. My confusion is why we need to have Making a Base Backup. When you have time can you please clarify? Regards On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca> wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote: > > So Is it always good to have the backup using PG_dump instead of PITR or > > a combination of both > > > > I like to do both. Ongoing PITR, daily base backups (by updating an rsync > copy), and weekly pg_dumps that in turn go to tape. > > PITR gives a very recent restore point in the event of server loss. As > previously mentioned, the full (custom) backups let you restore individual > tables. They're also a lot smaller than base backups + WAL logs. > > -- > "No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. We tried but that > damn monkey was just too fast." > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: