Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
От | Alan Hodgson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incremental Backups in postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200911101356.17600@hal.medialogik.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incremental Backups in postgres (akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
Re: Incremental Backups in postgres |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 10 November 2009, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote: > So Is it always good to have the backup using PG_dump instead of PITR or > a combination of both > I like to do both. Ongoing PITR, daily base backups (by updating an rsync copy), and weekly pg_dumps that in turn go to tape. PITR gives a very recent restore point in the event of server loss. As previously mentioned, the full (custom) backups let you restore individual tables. They're also a lot smaller than base backups + WAL logs. -- "No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. We tried but that damn monkey was just too fast."
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: