Hi,
Could someone review the v17 patch to proceed this?
The v17 patch:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20240305.171808.667980402249336456.kou%40clear-code.com#d2ee079b75ebcf00c410300ecc4a357a
Some profiles by Michael:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ZelfYatRdVZN3FbE%40paquier.xyz#eccfd1a0131af93c48026d691cc247f4
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20240308.092254.359611633589181574.kou@clear-code.com>
"Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:22:54 +0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <ZelfYatRdVZN3FbE@paquier.xyz>
> "Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:32:01 +0900,
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
>> While on it, here are some profiles based on HEAD and v17 with the
>> previous tests (COPY TO /dev/null, COPY FROM data sent to the void).
>>
> ...
>>
>> So, in short, and that's not really a surprise, there is no effect
>> once we use the dispatching with the routines only when a format would
>> want to plug-in with the APIs, but a custom format would still have a
>> penalty of a few percents for both if bottlenecked on CPU.
>
> Thanks for sharing these profiles!
> I agree with you.
>
> This shows that the v17 approach doesn't affect the current
> text/csv/binary implementations. (The v17 approach just adds
> 2 new structs, Copy{From,To}Rountine, without changing the
> current text/csv/binary implementations.)
>
> Can we push the v17 patch and proceed following
> implementations? Could someone (especially a PostgreSQL
> committer) take a look at this for double-check?
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
>