Hi,
In <ZcMIDgkdSrz5ibvf@paquier.xyz>
"Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:33:18 +0900,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Hmm. That explains why I was not seeing any differences with this
> callback then. It seems to me that the order of actions to take is
> clear, like:
> - Revert 2889fd23be56 to keep a clean state of the tree, now done with
> 1aa8324b81fa.
Done.
> - Dive into the strlen() issue, as it really looks like this can
> create more simplifications for the patch discussed on this thread
> with COPY TO.
Done: b619852086ed2b5df76631f5678f60d3bebd3745
> - Revisit what we have here, looking at more profiles to see how HEAD
> an v13 compare. It looks like we are on a good path, but let's tackle
> things one step at a time.
Are you already working on this? Do you want me to write the
next patch based on the current master?
Thanks,
--
kou