Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220718095304.g5ro2544jgpgvybu@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Jul-18, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Hi hackers, > > > > If someone put a lot of review into a patchset a few months ago, they > > > absolutely deserve credit. But if that entry has been sitting with no > > > feedback this month, why is it useful to keep that Reviewer around? > > As I recall, several committers reported before that they use > Reviewers field in the CF application when writing the commit message. > I would argue that this is the reason. Maybe we need two separate reviewer columns -- one for credits (historical tracking) and one for people currently reviewing a patch. So we definitely expect an email "soon" from someone in the second column, but not from somebody who is only in the first column. -- Álvaro Herrera
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: