Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 09011009-ef7f-9819-5822-d82647e40f72@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/18/22 02:53, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2022-Jul-18, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > >> Hi hackers, >> >>>> If someone put a lot of review into a patchset a few months ago, they >>>> absolutely deserve credit. But if that entry has been sitting with no >>>> feedback this month, why is it useful to keep that Reviewer around? >> >> As I recall, several committers reported before that they use >> Reviewers field in the CF application when writing the commit message. >> I would argue that this is the reason. > > Maybe we need two separate reviewer columns -- one for credits > (historical tracking) and one for people currently reviewing a patch. > So we definitely expect an email "soon" from someone in the second > column, but not from somebody who is only in the first column. +1 -- Joe Conway RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: