Re: Minor cleanup of partbounds.c
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minor cleanup of partbounds.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200909170505.GA25445@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Minor cleanup of partbounds.c (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Minor cleanup of partbounds.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Sep-09, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > Here is a patch for minor cleanup of the partbounds.c changes made by > commit c8434d64c: 1) removes a useless assignment (in normal builds) LGTM. > and 2) improves comments a little. No objection to changing "bounds" to "range bounds". I think the point other is to replace the only appearance of "dummy relation" to better match the extensive use of "dummy partition" in this file. The concept of a "dummy relation" is well established in the planner. I didn't know if "dummy partition" is itself a concept (apparently in the newfangled partition-wise join stuff), or just glorified wording to say "a dummy relation that happens to be a partition". Looking at is_dummy_partition, apparently a dummy partition is either a dummy relation or a partition that doesn't have a RelOptInfo. So my conclusion is that this wording is okay to change too. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: