Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
| От | Justin Pryzby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20200326221752.GR17431@telsasoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Re: error context for vacuum to include block number Re: error context for vacuum to include block number |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:04:57AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Does that address your comment ? I hope so. > > I'm not sure why "free_oldindname" is necessary. Since we initialize > > vacrelstats->indname with NULL and revert the callback arguments at > > the end of functions that needs update them, vacrelstats->indname is > > NULL at the beginning of lazy_vacuum_index() and lazy_cleanup_index(). > > And we make a copy of index name in update_vacuum_error_cbarg(). So I > > think we can pfree the old index name if errcbarg->indname is not NULL. > > We want to avoid doing this: > olderrcbarg = *vacrelstats // saves a pointer > update_vacuum_error_cbarg(... NULL); // frees the pointer and sets indname to NULL > update_vacuum_error_cbarg(... olderrcbarg.oldindnam) // puts back the pointer, which has been freed > // hit an error, and the callback accesses the pfreed pointer > > I think that's only an issue for lazy_vacuum_index(). > > And I think you're right: we only save state when the calling function has a > indname=NULL, so we never "put back" a non-NULL indname. We go from having a > indname=NULL at lazy_scan_heap to not not-NULL at lazy_vacuum_index, and never > the other way around. So once we've "reverted back", 1) the pointer is null; > and, 2) the callback function doesn't access it for the previous/reverted phase > anyway. I removed the free_oldindname argument. > Hm, I was just wondering what happens if an error happens *during* > update_vacuum_error_cbarg(). It seems like if we set > errcbarg->phase=VACUUM_INDEX before setting errcbarg->indname=indname, then an > error would cause a crash. And if we pfree and set indname before phase, it'd > be a problem when going from an index phase to non-index phase. So maybe we > have to set errcbarg->phase=VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_UNKNOWN while in the function, > and errcbarg->phase=phase last. And addressed that. Also, I realized that lazy_cleanup_index has an early "return", so the "Revert back" was ineffective. We talked about how that wasn't needed, since we never go back to a previous phase. Amit wanted to keep it there for consistency, but I'd prefer to put any extra effort into calling out the special treatment needed/given to lazy_vacuum_heap/index, rather than making everything "consistent". Amit: I also moved the TRUNCATE_HEAP bit back to truncate_heap(), since 1) it's odd if we don't have anything in truncate_heap() about error reporting except for "vacrelstats->blkno = blkno"; and, 2) it's nice to set the err callback arg right after pgstat_progress, and outside of any loop. In previous versions, it was within the loop, because it closely wrapped RelationTruncate() and count_nondeletable_pages() - a previous version used separate phases. -- Justin
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: