Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture
От | Christoph Berg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200316124145.GB2250185@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture
|
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Re: Amit Khandekar 2020-03-16 <CAJ3gD9e2Q9MQxa3DTbS8Jo9D_3GTKrWHyzQvqRuypHBX-=uUkA@mail.gmail.com> > So, when we see that there are N number of OS/architecture > combinations for which PGDG does not provide packages, is it so > because we don't have dedicated machines satisfying the minumum > requirements like RAM/core/disk ? In other words, is it only a matter > of providing such machine and adding it up in the buildfarm members > where it passes the regression tests, or there are are some more > requirements over and above the machine resource requirements after > which PGDG can officially support those OS/architecture combinations ? The buildfarm machines have nothing to do with the build daemons behind apt.postgresql.org or yum.postgresql.org; they are entirely different infrastructure. I guess asking the buildfarm operators if they can spare machines as build daemons might work, but I haven't had the time to dig into that. If you care about a specific architecture, it would be nice if you could arrange that. Christoph
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: