Re: Ordering of header file inclusion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Ordering of header file inclusion
Дата
Msg-id 20191019211419.h6wjsash5tbkq6yk@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Ordering of header file inclusion  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Ordering of header file inclusion  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Ordering of header file inclusion  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-10-19 21:50:03 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> diff --git a/contrib/bloom/blcost.c b/contrib/bloom/blcost.c
> index f9fe57f..6224735 100644
> --- a/contrib/bloom/blcost.c
> +++ b/contrib/bloom/blcost.c
> @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
>   */
>  #include "postgres.h"
> 
> +#include "bloom.h"
>  #include "fmgr.h"
>  #include "utils/selfuncs.h"
> 
> -#include "bloom.h"
> 
>  /*
>   * Estimate cost of bloom index scan.
> 
> This class of change I don't like.
> 
> The existing arrangement keeps "other" header files separate from the
> header file of the module itself.  It seems useful to keep that separate.

If we were to do so, we ought to put bloom.h first and clearly seperated
out, not last, as the former makes the bug of the the header not being
standalone more obvious.

I'm -1 on having a policy of putting the headers separate though, I feel
that's too much work, and there's too many cases where it's not that
clear which header that should be.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Backport "WITH ... AS MATERIALIZED" syntax to <12?
Следующее
От: Euler Taveira
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add a GUC variable that control logical replication