Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190402170051.GA22324@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2019-Apr-02, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2019-04-02 12:51:08 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > AFAICS this error can only come from ExecDelete(), because the value 1 > > is TM_Invisible and the other callsites where the "unexpected > > table_lock_tuple" error appears use different wording for that one. > > Hm? Why couldn't it be the ExecUpdate() case? You're right, that one too. > > Maybe it's the result of a deferred constraint being checked at that > > time ... maybe it's trying to honor an "on cascade delete" setting for > > an FK, and the affected tuple has already been updated or deleted? > > Then it ought to get TM_Deleted, no? We ought to wait till that > transaction commits, and then roll back. I was thinking that this would have happened in the same transaction; but yeah I didn't spend too much time analyzing the exact code flow. Anyway I agree that there's something odd going on, and perhaps you just unmasked an earlier bug. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: