Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190402161320.o5wkbp7evuzqe4c2@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed
Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, On 2019-04-02 12:51:08 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-Apr-02, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > >> 2019-04-01 15:27:38.829 +07 [7524] STATEMENT: UPDATE pgbench_accounts SET > > >> abalance = 1 WHERE aid = 1; > > >> 2019-04-01 15:27:38.829 +07 [7524] PANIC: cannot abort transaction > > >> 400048276, it was already committed > > > > > But that's probably a separate issue. > > > > What that seems to indicate is that the "unexpected table_lock_tuple > > status" error was thrown during commit, which seems pretty odd. > > AFAICS this error can only come from ExecDelete(), because the value 1 > is TM_Invisible and the other callsites where the "unexpected > table_lock_tuple" error appears use different wording for that one. Hm? Why couldn't it be the ExecUpdate() case? > Maybe it's the result of a deferred constraint being checked at that > time ... maybe it's trying to honor an "on cascade delete" setting for > an FK, and the affected tuple has already been updated or deleted? Then it ought to get TM_Deleted, no? We ought to wait till that transaction commits, and then roll back. So there's something odd happening here. I suspect there has to be some additional log output or such to explain this. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: