Re: New archives layout is not an improvement
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New archives layout is not an improvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180420142331.ykn7zsd3ddo2hc33@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New archives layout is not an improvement ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: New archives layout is not an improvement
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > > On Apr 20, 2018, at 2:20 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:34:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes: > >>> We’ve made a deploy to help with the browsing and reading experiences > >>> that you have mentioned. > >> > >> This is definitely an improvement, thanks! > > > > I like the message page density now, but the loss of index page > > (e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers/since/201804181425) > > density is still dramatic. My viewport that formerly fit 43 subject lines now > > fits 14. > > How do you feel about scrolling on this page in a mobile view? I ask because > we may need to balance how many entries appear on desktop vs. mobile, > but before adjusting I’d like to get some feedback on if we need more/less > entries in mobile view as well. I looked at the same yesterday and I agree with Noah. There's too much vertical space there. I think the problem of horizontal scrolling in mobile for the archives (mentioned by Peter G) is so serious, that the archives are just not usable in mobile at all. If the archives in mobile are unusable, why try to cater with minor spacing tweaks? Adjusting vertical spacing to help mobile is really a thing too minor -- it needs a major revamp first, in particular to handle text flow, as Peter suggests. (I don't know specifically about using the Gmail algorithm, whatever that is.) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: