Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170814222955.sowcmnabfdgmlmdn@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2017-08-11 13:26:29 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-08-11 16:20:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I wrote: > > > So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered > > > to plug it into ExecReScan. From which we may draw depressing conclusions > > > about how much it's been tested. > > > > While I'm bitching ... the code coverage report at > > > > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/executor/nodeGatherMerge.c.gcov.html > > > > also leaves one with less than a warm feeling about the extent of test > > coverage on this file. heap_compare_slots isn't invoked even once? > > I complained about this before at > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170401022605.4wag26gtyzhny7ue%40alap3.anarazel.de > but I just noticed that Rushabh appears to have sent a patch adding > coverage. Missed that somehow, will apply. And pushed (to both 10 and master). - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: