Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170811202629.3eebdnnv7osn5hqw@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2017-08-11 16:20:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered > > to plug it into ExecReScan. From which we may draw depressing conclusions > > about how much it's been tested. > > While I'm bitching ... the code coverage report at > > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/executor/nodeGatherMerge.c.gcov.html > > also leaves one with less than a warm feeling about the extent of test > coverage on this file. heap_compare_slots isn't invoked even once? I complained about this before at http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170401022605.4wag26gtyzhny7ue%40alap3.anarazel.de but I just noticed that Rushabh appears to have sent a patch adding coverage. Missed that somehow, will apply. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: