Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
Дата
Msg-id 20160331181438.GA129524@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6  (Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
What led you to choose the ? operator for the FOLLOWED BY semantics?
It doesn't seem a terribly natural choice -- most other things seems to
use ? as some sort of wildcard.  What about something like "...", so you
would do SELECT q @@ to_tsquery('fatal ... error');
and  SELECT q @@ (tsquery 'fatal' ... tsquery 'error');

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Ivanov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
Следующее
От: Dean Rasheed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: improving GROUP BY estimation