Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150828141744.GC21830@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files. (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions
for reading files.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:41:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 08:44:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas > >> <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi> wrote: > >> > Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files. > >> > > >> > This makes it possible to use the functions without getting errors, if there > >> > is a chance that the file might be removed or renamed concurrently. > >> > pg_rewind needs to do just that, although this could be useful for other > >> > purposes too. (The changes to pg_rewind to use these functions will come in > >> > a separate commit.) > >> > > >> > The read_binary_file() function isn't very well-suited for extensions.c's > >> > purposes anymore, if it ever was. So bite the bullet and make a copy of it > >> > in extension.c, tailored for that use case. This seems better than the > >> > accidental code reuse, even if it's a some more lines of code. > >> > >> This has been done done as the part of a fix for the issues with > >> pg_rewind, but perhaps it should be mentioned in the release notes? > > > > Yes, I will pick up that change during the creation of the 9.6 release > > notes. > > Even if it has been introduced in 9.5? Well, this is where I got lost then, because I only see it going into master, which, uh, I thought was 9.6, but I am now realizing this was committed before we branched. :-( This will be picked up when the 9.5 release notes are updated to match git. Actually, I now see this in the 9.5 release notes: <simpara>Current as of 2015-08-03</simpara> This was updated by Tom: ecc2d16b (Tom Lane 2015-08-03 12:29:10 -0400 10) <simpara>Current as of 2015-08-03</simpara> and I see Tom added it properly: <!-- 2015-06-28 [cb2acb1] Heikki..: Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for.. --> <para> Add an optional <replaceable>missing_ok</> argument to <link linkend="functions-admin-genfile-table"><function>pg_read_file()</></> and related functions (Michael Paquier, Heikki Linnakangas) </para> </listitem> so, after all that detail, I think we are good. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: