Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150319171712.GH6061@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:33:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:42:20PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > No. And we don't know how to change the default opclass without > > > breaking things, either. > > > > Is there a page on the Wiki along the lines of "things that we would > > like to change if ever there is a substantial change in on-disk format > > that will break pg_upgrade"? ISTM that we should be intelligently > > saving those some place, just as Redhat presumably save up > > ABI-breakage over many years for the next major release of RHEL. > > Alexander's complaint is a good example of such a change, IMV. Isn't > > it more or less expected that the day will come when we'll make a > > clean break? > > It is on the TODO page under pg_upgrade: > > Desired changes that would prevent upgrades with pg_upgrade Item added to TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: