Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140929023333.GI12447@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:42:20PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > No. And we don't know how to change the default opclass without > > breaking things, either. > > Is there a page on the Wiki along the lines of "things that we would > like to change if ever there is a substantial change in on-disk format > that will break pg_upgrade"? ISTM that we should be intelligently > saving those some place, just as Redhat presumably save up > ABI-breakage over many years for the next major release of RHEL. > Alexander's complaint is a good example of such a change, IMV. Isn't > it more or less expected that the day will come when we'll make a > clean break? It is on the TODO page under pg_upgrade: Desired changes that would prevent upgrades with pg_upgrade -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: