Re: BUG #8139: initdb: Misleading error message when current user not in /etc/passwd
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8139: initdb: Misleading error message when current user not in /etc/passwd |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140110230412.GA15692@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #8139: initdb: Misleading error message when current user not in /etc/passwd (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #8139: initdb: Misleading error message when current
user not in /etc/passwd
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 05:23:43PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Are we not moving items over to common where appropriate? > > I don't think we're moving code from src/port to src/common just for the > heck of it; but ISTM if we're adding new code which belongs to > src/common, and there's a natural file for it in src/port which should > arguably also be in src/common, then it makes sense to put both the new > code and the old file together in src/common. > > Note that nothing in src/port should depend on stuff in src/common. As > I see it, src/port is very bare-bones stuff which src/common builds on > top of. It might also make sense, in some cases, to consider low-level > routines in src/port that are used by higher level routines in > src/common. OK, C file moved from /port to /common. > > Are we worried about bring external applications? > > Please rephrase. What are we worried about? I was asking if we did not move old functions from port to common because of concern about breaking 3rd party applications. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: