Re: palloc unification
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: palloc unification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130206143835.GC4299@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: palloc unification (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: palloc unification
Re: palloc unification |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I propose to have a new subdirectory src/include/shared, and two > > header files: > > The frontend (pg_malloc) function definitions would live somewhere in, > > say, src/shared/fe_memutils.c. For the palloc() implementation, I think > > we should create another file, so that frontend-only programs that do > > not require those symbols (most of them) are not unnecessarily bloated. > > > > Opinions on having a new subdir? > I like the idea of having a place for shared frontend and backend code > very much, but I don't think src/include/shared or src/shared is a > good name, because "shared" can mean a lot of things - like "shared > library", for example. I think that this should be set up in a manner > analogous to libpgport, except not for portability code, but instead > for other stuff. Maybe we could call it libpgframework or something. Yeah, I am doing this right now and the "shared" name doesn't seem so good. "libpgframework" sounds decent. So since libpgport comes from src/port, are we okay with src/framework and src/include/framework? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: