Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201101121812.p0CICm021975@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups > > > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein. > > > > > > Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were unclear > > > or awkward, and this diff generated by me attempts to address them. > > > > > > I have already updated the documentation proofreading wiki: > > > > > > ? ? ? ?http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Documentation_Proofreading > > > > I don't think changing "see below" to "refer below" or "call" to > > "execute" is an improvement; even if we did that uniformly throughout > > our documentation, surely future editors are going to reuse those > > phrasings. > > > > A lot of these other changes look pretty dubious too, although some > > seem worthwhile. > > OK, that last part seems kind of vague. ;-) Can you hack up the diff > to have just the changes you think are worthwhile? You can just remove > the parts of the diff you don't like. Robert, here is a unified diff, which I think it easier to review for single-line documention changes. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: