Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > 
> > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at
> > all.
> The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items.  This
> is a work item, and not a small one.
What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?

Andres