Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Andres Freund wrote:
> On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > > 
> > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at
> > > all.
> > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items.  This
> > is a work item, and not a small one.
> What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?

You mean turned on by default, right?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +