Re: pgsql: PG_MAJORVERSION: For simplicity, use PG_MAJORVERSION rather than
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: PG_MAJORVERSION: For simplicity, use PG_MAJORVERSION rather than |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201001070009.o0709OB03659@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: PG_MAJORVERSION: For simplicity, use PG_MAJORVERSION rather than (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: PG_MAJORVERSION: For simplicity, use
PG_MAJORVERSION rather than
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Log Message: > > ----------- > > PG_MAJORVERSION: > > > > For simplicity, use PG_MAJORVERSION rather than PG_VERSION for creation > > of the PG_VERSION file. > > I think this is a bad style to use for commit messages. For GIT, a good > commit message is a first line being a summary, and a more extensive > message below. The way you used a contentless first line means that > somebody perusing a "git shortlog" or "git annotate" does not get any > useful information out of it. It would have been better phrased > like > > "Use PG_MAJORVERSION define to create the PG_VERSION file > > It is easier than using the PG_VERSION define." > > or similar. That is just too odd. I think I forgot about the summary idea then. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: