Re: pg_migrator progress
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_migrator progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200903281918.n2SJIUm14013@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_migrator progress (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> But having said that, there isn't any real harm in fixing the OID > >> counter to match what it was. You need to run pg_resetxlog to set the > >> WAL position and XID counter anyway, and it can set the OID counter too. > > > FYI, I decided against restoring the oid counter because it might > > collide with an oid assigned during pg_migrator schema creation. > > That argument seems pretty empty --- why is it more likely than a > collision happening if you *don't* restore the oid counter? And why We don't transfer any system-level oids so there is no chance of a collision against system tables. > would it matter anyway? We fixed the problems with oid collisions > some time ago. Oh, we handled that; OK, old code restored. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: